Evaluation of the move to remote models of service delivery by drug and alcohol services in Leeds during the COVID-19 pandemic
Evaluation completed September 2022
Howlett N, and others. Remote delivery of alcohol and/or substance misuse interventions for adults: A systematic review protocol. PLOS One 2021; 16(11). Available from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259525
Howlett N, and others. A systematic review and behaviour change technique analysis of remotely delivered alcohol and/or substance misuse interventions for adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2022; 239. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109597
Lloyd N, and others. Evaluation of the move to remote delivery of drug and alcohol services during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study protocol. Journal of Public Health Research 2022; 11(3). Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036221106583
Garcia-Iglesias J, and others. Exploring the Promise and Limitations of Autonomous Online Timelines to Understand Experiences of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sociological Research Online 2022; 28(3) 870-883. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804221084341
Lloyd N, and others. Home working during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of drug and alcohol support workers. Journal of Public Health Research 2025; 14(4). Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251381226
Findings from a systematic review of alcohol and substance misuse interventions delivered remotely
Key findings from an evaluation of drug and alcohol services: Finding the Balance
Key findings from an evaluation of drug and alcohol services: Home working
Key findings from an evaluation of drug and alcohol services: Organisational Resilience
Key findings from an evaluation of drug and alcohol services: Resources to consider
Key findings from an evaluation of drug and alcohol services: Outcomes Evaluation
Key findings from an evaluation of drug and alcohol services: Health Economics
What does the evaluation mean for Local Government?
The knowledge produced by this research provided an understanding of how drug and alcohol support services can be best configured in future, drawing on lessons learnt during COVID-19 about the relative benefits and disadvantages of remote delivery. This research also highlighted important lessons for effective remote delivery for support services, service providers, and commissioners beyond drug and alcohol support. A range of experts locally and nationally were involved in supporting the research process.
What does the evaluation mean for the Public?
This study provided valuable findings for those who use drug and alcohol treatment services across the UK and internationally. Additionally, by including ‘unheard’ voices via creative methods, this study facilitated representation of those with the potential to experience marginalisation within these communities.
How are the public involved in the evaluation?
The public was involved throughout the project in several different ways. This included a local service user consultation group who helped to ensure we answer questions important to them and provided relevant insight when discussing findings and producing outputs. Additionally, throughout all PHIRST Connect projects the Public Involvement in Research group act as a critical friend on key elements of the research process. They contributed at all stages of the Covid DASE project including being involved in data analysis and interpretation of findings and consideration of implications for future service design.
Lay summary of research
The COVID-19 pandemic meant that there needed to be substantial changes to the delivery of drug and alcohol support services across Leeds. This included stopping, or significantly reducing, face-to-face support services, and a move to remote delivery of key drug and support services. Remote service delivery means delivering services mostly over the phone or using technology such as video calls, smartphone apps, or instant messaging, rather than face-to-face. Prior to Covid-19, face-to-face delivery had been the main way that service users engaged with drug and alcohol support services.
Although there was disruption to the usual way of delivering support services, there was some evidence that aspects of remote delivery have been experienced positively by some drug and alcohol support staff and some service users.
The aim of the study was to understand the impact of COVID-19 on the drug and alcohol services in Leeds, and the changes that staff and service users experienced, in order to come to an informed decision about how best to design services in the future.
The study answered the following, broad research questions:
- how did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the delivery of the various drug and alcohol support services?
- how were any changes in drug and alcohol support service delivery experienced by those delivering those services and those in receipt of them?
- what impact, if any, did remote delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic have on outcomes for service users and were any groups of people particularly disadvantaged by the changes?
- what was the impact of remote delivery on the cost of delivering drug and alcohol support services, and what were the cost implications for service users?
The research was conducted by:
1. Looking at what was already written about drug and alcohol support
2. Asking drug and alcohol support staff to fill in a timeline about their experiences, and take part in one-to-one interviews and group discussions
3. Group discussions, one-to-one interviews, and text messaging and email conversations with service users, plus creative case studies creation with staff who worked with on-street sex workers
4. Comparing past information (data) with new data that described outcomes for service users before and after COVID-19
5.Looking at how remote delivery impacted financial cost (health economics)
Local Government / Partner(s)
Leeds City Council
PHIRST Connect Research Team
Nigel Lloyd, Dr Suzanne Bartington, Charis Bontoft, Dr Gavin Breslin, Dr Olujoke Fakoya, Imogen Freethy,
Dr Jaime Garcia Iglesias, Dr Neil Howlett, Nigel Smeeton, Dr Adam P Wagner, Amander Wellings,
Professor Katherine Brown
*All PHIRST Connect members input into every project